#publisher Topics Sections * Latest updates * Leaders * Briefing * United States * The Americas * Asia * China * Middle East and Africa * Europe * Britain * International * Business * Finance and economics * Science and technology * Books and arts * Graphic detail * Obituary * Special reports * Debates * Open Future Blogs * Bagehot’s notebook * Bartleby * Charlemagne’s notebook * Democracy in America * Erasmus * Free exchange * Game theory * Gulliver * Prospero * The Economist explains Current edition More Apps & Digital Editions * The Economist apps * Espresso * Global Business Review * World in Figures Other Publications * 1843 magazine * The World In * The World If From The Economist Group * Events * Online GMAT prep * Online GRE prep * Executive Education Navigator * Which MBA * Jobs Board * Learning.ly * The Economist Store * The Economist Intelligence Unit * The Economist Corporate Network Media * Audio edition * Economist Films * Podcasts About The Economist Subscribe Log in or sign upManage subscription * (BUTTON) Log In * Forgot password? * New to The Economist? Sign up now * Activate your digital subscription * Manage your subscription * Renew your subscription Search ____________________ Topics * Latest updates * Leaders * Briefing * United States * The Americas * Asia * China * Middle East and Africa * Europe * Britain * International * Business * Finance and economics * Science and technology * Books and arts * Graphic detail * Obituary * Special reports * Debates * Open Future Blogs * Bagehot’s notebook * Bartleby * Charlemagne’s notebook * Democracy in America * Erasmus * Free exchange * Game theory * Gulliver * Prospero * The Economist explains Current edition Audio edition Economist Films Podcasts The Economist apps More * Apps & Digital Editions * The Economist apps * Espresso * Global Business Review * World in Figures ______________________________________________________________ * Other Publications * 1843 magazine * The World In * The World If ______________________________________________________________ * From The Economist Group * Events * Online GMAT prep * Online GRE prep * Executive Education Navigator * Which MBA * Jobs Board * Learning.ly * The Economist Store * The Economist Intelligence Unit * The Economist Corporate Network ______________________________________________________________ * About The Economist Subscribe Foggy outlookHow the twists and turns of the trade war are hurting growth The IMF downgrades its forecasts for the global economy. Again Print edition | Finance and economics Oct 17th 2019 | HONG KONG AFTER WELCOMING the St Louis Blues, a championship-winning ice-hockey team, to the White House on October 15th, President Donald Trump fondly recalled a recent triumph of his own: last week’s tentative trade deal with China. Simply put, America will impose no further punitive tariffs on Chinese imports if China promises to buy American farm goods worth billions of dollars. How many billions? “It’s very big numbers,” Mr Trump emphasised. “I said, ‘Ask for 70.’…My people said, ‘All right, make it 20.’ I said, ‘No, make it 50.’” Will this carefully calibrated amount ever materialise? China does not want to pay over the odds or deprive other, friendlier suppliers of its custom. It also wants America to go beyond promising no new tariffs and to start removing existing ones. The deal may unravel before it is written down, let alone signed by the two countries’ leaders next month at the Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation forum in Santiago. Get our daily newsletter Upgrade your inbox and get our Daily Dispatch and Editor's Picks. ____________________ Sign up now That unpredictability is a problem. Not just higher tariffs but “prolonged trade-policy uncertainty” are damaging the world economy, said Gita Gopinath, the IMF’s chief economist, this week as the fund again cut its forecast for global growth. “Manufacturing firms have become more cautious about long-range spending and have held back on equipment and machinery purchases,” the fund notes. The fog of trade war is depressing investment spending. And because machinery, equipment and other capital goods are often imported, weak investment spending is further hurting trade. The IMF now expects the world economy to expand by just 3% this year, compared with 3.6% last year. That would be the slowest rate in the decade since the global financial crisis. Both America and the euro zone are expected to grow more slowly this year than the fund had envisaged in July, before trade tensions escalated. India’s prospects have dimmed sharply: it is forecast to grow by 6.1% rather than the 7% expected only months ago. And in 2020 China is now projected to expand by less than 6% for the first time in 30 years. The fund has, unsurprisingly, slashed its forecast for Hong Kong. The city is now expected to grow by only 0.3%, compared with the 2.7% foreseen in April, before its economic prospects vanished in a cloud of tear-gas. The unrest could also jeopardise the fragile trade truce between America and China. On October 15th the House of Representatives passed a measure enjoining America to assess Hong Kong’s autonomy annually and sanction officials who violate it. China reacted angrily to what it describes as meddling in its affairs. The IMF’s economists have valiantly tried to quantify the damage to the world economy from the trade war if Mr Trump’s putative deal falls apart. The direct impact is surprisingly modest. The tariffs already in place and in the pipeline could reduce America’s GDP by just over 0.2% next year, compared with a world in which the trade war had never started (see chart). More harmful are indirect effects: weaker business confidence, productivity and risk-appetite on financial markets. These bring the damage to almost 0.6% of America’s GDP in 2020. The damage to China would be almost 2% of its GDP. These are small percentages—but of vast economies. If the IMF is right, an unresolved trade war could cost America roughly $125bn of forgone output next year alone. The cost to China could exceed $300bn (at market exchange rates). Big numbers indeed. This article appeared in the Finance and economics section of the print edition under the headline "Foggy outlook" Print edition | Finance and economics Oct 17th 2019 | HONG KONG Reuse this content About The Economist * The killer question The killer questionWas America’s assassination of Qassem Suleimani justified? A fierce debate swirls on its legality; and on whether it will be good for America From protest to power From protest to powerThe stars have aligned for Germany’s Greens Bagehot BagehotBoris Johnson is reinventing one-nation Conservatism Daily chart Daily chartThe killing of Qassem Suleimani sends gold to a seven-year high When it's a matter of opinion, make your opinion matter Subscribe now Each week, over one million subscribers trust us to help them make sense of the world. Join them. Subscribe to The Economist today or Sign up to continue reading five free articles Classified ads * Subscribe * Group subscriptions * Contact us * Help Keep updated * * * * * * Subscribe to The Economist newsletters Sign up to get more from The Economist Get 5 free articles per month, daily newsletters and more. ____________________ Sign up * About The Economist * Advertise * Reprints * Careers * Media Centre Published since September 1843 to take part in “a severe contest between intelligence, which presses forward, and an unworthy, timid ignorance obstructing our progress.” * Terms of Use * Privacy * Cookie Policy * (BUTTON) Manage Cookies * Accessibility * Modern Slavery Statement Copyright © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2020. All rights reserved.